For decades, it’s been a popular belief that the only path to sobriety and recovery was through the Alcoholic Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous programs. The idea that AA or NA is the end-all-be-all of sobriety is collapsing.
The founders of the Alcoholic Anonymous program originated from a Christian Evangelical movement that was coined the Oxford Group.The 12-Step Program uses elements from this group such as self-examination and a belief in a “higher power”.
The program claims to accept all religions but they start their meetings off with a prayer, as well as push the idea that the only way to complete their 12-Steps and remain sober is that one must bow to some idea of a “higher power”.
There are a abundance of cases where judges and probation officers have forced addicts to attend AA/NA meeting as a requirement of their rehabilitation. Those who want secular settings are fighting back against the system.
The Robert Warner Case
In the state of New York in 1990, Atheist Robert Warner was mandated by his parole officer to attend AA meetings after being convicted of drunk driving. After two years of meeting this requirement, he started to object because of the deep Christian beliefs embedded in the 12-Step Program. Beliefs that he did not agree with.
In 1992, he filed a motion stating that the requirement of AA and the 12-Step Program were against his First Amendment Rights under the Establishment Clause. This motion was ruled against his judge, as his judge was the one that initially required him to attend the meetings.
The Ricky Inouye Case
Ricky Inouye, a self-proclaimed Buddhist, was incarcerated in Hawaii in 2000. Right before his release, Inouye had his lawyer send a letter asking the judge to not be placed in a religious-based program. He preferred a secular setting. Despite this, his parole officer failed to find a secular treatment program and maintained that attending AA/NA meetings were his only choice.
When Inouye failed to attend these meetings, he was sent back to prison for a probation violation. In 2003, Inouye filed a suit against his probation officer. He lost his case and died during the course of the lawsuit. His son appealed the case a few years later and won.
It’s been founded that it is against an American’s constitutional rights, the seperation of church and state, to force the AA/NA meetings for treatment.
3 Alternatives to the 12-Steps
Addicts need to be aware that they do have choices outside of AA and NA. Depending on the location, it may be difficult to find alternatives but most of these programs and groups do have online forums and communities to interact with others that are recovering.
They also encourage addicts to start up their own support groups under their organizations if one isn’t available in their area.
These are the most substantial support groups available.
The Secular Organization for Sobriety was founded in 1985 by James Christopher, a recovering alcoholic. SOS is considered a non-professional support group that pledges to help those with any form of addiction to reach sobriety and have control over their choices.
The group believes that addiction thrives on isolation. Support group interactions can benefit sobriety.
They welcome all forms of belief and religion or lack thereof into their support group. They encourage any and all chosen paths to sobriety and SOS is anonymous.
Mission Statement: SOS empowers the individual to find and keep sobriety and/or abstinence. SOS offers a variety of recovery tools to assist new groups and individuals with beginning the process.
SMART is another addiction recovery group that self-empowers the addict. They keep everyone up to date with scientific research regarding addiction to help evolve the ideas around recovery.
Their biggest goal is to employ self-empowerment and self-reliance while using a 4-Point Program..
SMART deals with any form of addiction as well. They include face-to-face meetings with addicts, around the world, and hold daily online meetings. Their strongest attribute is that they are recognized as a legitimate resource of substance abuse and addiction recovery by the US Department of Health and Human Services.
Mission Statement: To support individuals who have chosen to abstain, or are considering abstinence from any type of addictive behaviors (substances or activities), by teaching how to change self-defeating thinking, emotions, and actions; and to work towards long-term satisfaction and quality of life.
Women for Sobriety was created by Dr. Jean Kirkpatrick, an avid alcoholic. It’s an exclusive program for women.
Dr. Kirkpatrick believes that women need to approach their recovery different than men. Women have emotional needs that are often not met by the average drug program or treatment.
WFS is known to have a remarkable program for women and addiction. They incorporate their New Life Program that is based on their Thirteen Acceptance Statements. The Thirteen Acceptance Statements promote emotional growth.
Mission Statement: Women for Sobriety is an organization whose purpose is to help all women find their individual path to recovery through discovery of self, gained by sharing experiences, hopes, and encouragement with other women in similar circumstances. We are an abstinence-based self-help program for women facing issues of alcohol or drug addiction. Our “New Life Program” acknowledges the very special needs women have in recovery– the need to nurture feelings of self-value and self-worth and the desire to discard feelings of guilt, shame, and humiliation.
There has been a myth globally that there is only one acceptable program to partake in to maintain sobriety. This lie has ruined the journey of healing for many of those that weren’t quite a right fit for the AA or NA program.
Progress in research on addiction and differing religious beliefs has caused hoards of recovering addicts to turn away from these programs and find alternatives to their treatment. Straying away from these traditions has helped several addicts preserve sobriety in a new light.